>
> When I did run out of pinholes I was wondering if I could use the port range
> pin-hole to pass on the whole 1-1023 privileged port range requests direct to
> a Linux masquerading router:
>
> 210.55.x.x [M10] 192.168.1.254
> -crossover-
> 192.168.1.1 [Linux NAT/Masq] 192.168.2.1 -hub- others.
>
> Would that work? I've never played with, nor understood, the port range function,
> does it map many-to-one or many-to-many in a one-for-one way?
>

In theory this should work - you should be able to do many to many. One can only
try of course :)
the downside is that 2 sets of nat will add latency to the packet

cheers

-- 
Brendan Black - Network Engineer/Gravity Enforcement Officer, Telecom Internet
Services
email:	ratfink@xtra.co.nz (personal)	phone: +649 3555238 mobile: +6425 2752667
-export-a-crypto-system-sig -RSA-2-lines-PERL5
print pack"C*",split/\D+/,`echo "16iII*o\U@{$/=$z;[(pop,pop,unpack"H*",<>
)]}\EsMsKsN0[lN*1lK[d2%Sa2/d0<X+d*lMLa^*lN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0<J]dsJxp"|dc`
To unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@freebsddiary.cx
with "unsubscribe adsl" in the body of the message