Most correct in the case of Dslam, it is still ADSL but at a capped rate.

Also JS has only been out a year so any new plans would be most welcomed by
most. When there is only one company rolling a product out price reductions
etc will be slow.

128k is obviously a good start, with luck other variations will follow

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-adsl@unixathome.org [mailto:owner-adsl@unixathome.org]On
> Behalf Of rob.edkins@axon.co.nz
> Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 9:16 AM
> To: zagadka@penguinpowered.com; jamey@cafe.co.nz; adsl@unixathome.org
> Subject: RE: re[2]: Xtra Jetstart?
>
>
>
>
> Nem wrote:
> > All I can say is woo. (sarcasm) Rate limited adsl to 128 or
> > 512k whoopee. A
> > high bandwidth tech like adsl, brought to G.lite levels.
> > G.lite can do 512k,
> > and most modem chassis can do G.lite... why don't we use that
> > instead...
> >
> > Pros:
> > Cheap?
> > Doesn't need dslams - therefore any isp could offer it...
>
> Still needs a DSLAM, just doesn't need a Customer Premises splitter.
>
> Rob
>
> This message is part of the NZ ADSL mailing list.
> see http://unixathome.org/adsl/ for archives, FAQ,
> and various documents.
> To unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@unixathome.org
> with "unsubscribe adsl" in the body of the message
>
>

This message is part of the NZ ADSL mailing list.
see http://unixathome.org/adsl/ for archives, FAQ,
and various documents.
To unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@unixathome.org
with "unsubscribe adsl" in the body of the message
Received on Thu Dec 7 09:27:59 2000