New Zealand ADSL Mailing List


RE: re[2]: Xtra Jetstart?

From: Michael Bordignon <michael.b_at_infometrics.co.nz>
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2000 10:40:35 +1300
Message-ID: <11B671CB12E9D111A9DE0000F8E238951B13D5@INFOMETRICS2>

128k sucks, you might as well just get static dialup.

-----Original Message-----
From: Sean Glasspool [mailto:s.glasspool@braemac.co.nz]
Sent: Thursday, 7 December 2000 10:24 AM
To: Paul Mackenzie; adsl@unixathome.org
Subject: RE: re[2]: Xtra Jetstart?

Who thinks the early posting of the Jetstart WEB site was intentional? Just
to see what sort of feed back places like this forum would give them.
Personally, 128K is not "broadband." IMO. What's the big deal in offering
anything higher? At least get with the G.lite standard and offer 1.5Mbit,
flat rate for $60. That would certainly put the shits in the competitor?

I think the Cable providers will be laughing, as their capped rate plans
are 512K + unlimited, bla bla...

We can only wait and see..

Sean Glasspool
Account Manager
mailto:s.glasspool@braemac.co.nz

 -----Original Message-----
From: owner-adsl@unixathome.org [mailto:owner-adsl@unixathome.org] On
Behalf Of Paul Mackenzie
Sent: Thursday, 7 December 2000 9:28
To: adsl@unixathome.org
Subject: RE: re[2]: Xtra Jetstart?

Most correct in the case of Dslam, it is still ADSL but at a capped rate.

Also JS has only been out a year so any new plans would be most welcomed by
most. When there is only one company rolling a product out price reductions
etc will be slow.

128k is obviously a good start, with luck other variations will follow

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-adsl@unixathome.org [mailto:owner-adsl@unixathome.org]On
> Behalf Of rob.edkins@axon.co.nz
> Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 9:16 AM
> To: zagadka@penguinpowered.com; jamey@cafe.co.nz; adsl@unixathome.org
> Subject: RE: re[2]: Xtra Jetstart?
>
>
>
>
> Nem wrote:
> > All I can say is woo. (sarcasm) Rate limited adsl to 128 or
> > 512k whoopee. A
> > high bandwidth tech like adsl, brought to G.lite levels.
> > G.lite can do 512k,
> > and most modem chassis can do G.lite... why don't we use that
> > instead...
> >
> > Pros:
> > Cheap?
> > Doesn't need dslams - therefore any isp could offer it...
>
> Still needs a DSLAM, just doesn't need a Customer Premises splitter.
>
> Rob
>
> This message is part of the NZ ADSL mailing list.
> see http://unixathome.org/adsl/ for archives, FAQ,
> and various documents.
> To unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@unixathome.org
> with "unsubscribe adsl" in the body of the message
>
>

This message is part of the NZ ADSL mailing list.
see http://unixathome.org/adsl/ for archives, FAQ,
and various documents.
To unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@unixathome.org
with "unsubscribe adsl" in the body of the message

This message is part of the NZ ADSL mailing list.
see http://unixathome.org/adsl/ for archives, FAQ,
and various documents.
To unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@unixathome.org
with "unsubscribe adsl" in the body of the message

This message is part of the NZ ADSL mailing list.
see http://unixathome.org/adsl/ for archives, FAQ,
and various documents.
To unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@unixathome.org
with "unsubscribe adsl" in the body of the message
Received on Thu Dec 7 10:41:32 2000


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Nov 30 11:48:07 2006 EST