Re: 128k Flatrate question
From: Josh Bailey <josh_at_vandervecken.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 17:59:15 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0012111742300.5731-100000@tnt-debug.berkeley.edu>
On Mon, 11 Dec 2000, Don Stokes wrote:
> The folks at Murray Hill wouldn't have had trouble making that leap.
Actually, until 1996, most of them were, before Lucent was spun off - they
Bell Labs have rather a good understanding of the PSTN, having either
> Telco types were scared stiff of packets.
This is a trusim. I've found telcos internationally represent the general
Some APAC telcos certainly have the n * 64K syndrome. But your statement
A similiar problem is ISPs who are scared-stiff of circuits. Our VPN
> I really heard telco types talking like this; they really thought that
Why not? This is actually how it's sold in many places; you can put a
Back in 1993, who were you gonna call with 6Mb/s then? 128kb/s would've
> Mind you, at the time, telcos hadn't figured out that folks would
Actually, I've seen telcos worry about this for most of the last decade,
Nowadays the technology is starting to catch up; there are a few serious
One of my jobs is development of devices that slot directly into a 5E
Of course, you've never worked for a telco/in an international
-- Josh Bailey (josh@vandervecken.com - Berkeley, CA, USA) This message is part of the NZ ADSL mailing list. see http://unixathome.org/adsl/ for archives, FAQ, and various documents. To unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@unixathome.org with "unsubscribe adsl" in the body of the messageReceived on Tue Dec 12 06:59:34 2000 |
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Nov 30 11:48:07 2006 EST