Most Internal DSL Modems are "Win Modems" (ie they use processing power of
the computer to do all its work). So if you are doing things which can use
alot of CPU up for example the computers dont' have enough grunt to run the
modem properly (users with normal internal modems see this as well).

Thanks
Craig Whitmore

----- Original Message -----
From: "Nathan Legg" <thenexus@ihug.co.nz>
To: "Mark Foster" <blakjak@blakjak.net>
Cc: <adsl@lists.unixathome.org>
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 8:27 PM
Subject: Re: external vs internal

> Was hoping to get some actual reasons for this.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mark Foster" <blakjak@blakjak.net>
> To: "Nathan Legg" <thenexus@ihug.co.nz>
> Cc: <adsl@lists.unixathome.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 12:03 PM
> Subject: Re: external vs internal
>
>
> > Official word?
> > From the Telecom DSL Support desk ive been told that External (Routers)
> > are definately more reliable/stable in fringe areas, is that what youre
> > after?
> >
> > On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, Nathan Legg wrote:
> >
> > > (disclaimer: Searched the archive, but...)
> > >
> > > What's the official word on external vs internal, in regards to
> stability in
> > > fringe areas?
> > >

>
>
>

-- 
This message is part of the NZ ADSL mailing list. 
see http://unixathome.org/adsl/ for archives, FAQ, 
and various documents. 
To unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@lists.unixathome.org 
with "unsubscribe adsl" in the body of the message