LEE Tet Yoon wrote:
> The only thing that may have changed was
> maybe the CC made it clear they were violating the law by offering
> 192k whereas UBS was restricted to 128k? Did this occur? I'm still
> quite confused whether Telecom was actually be violating the
> law/requirements by offering 192k in their retail (and wholesale
> offerings) when they can only offer 128k for UBS or whether it's more
> of an operational decision by them to simplify matters etc.

No; as I mentioned in my earlier message, Telecom's commercial service
is *not* bound by the Commerce Commission's determination. It should in
fact not be called "UBS" as that refers to the regulated service, which
currently does not exist.

-- 
Juha
-- 
This message is part of the NZ ADSL mailing list. 
see http://unixathome.org/adsl/ for archives, FAQ, 
and various documents. 
To unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@lists.unixathome.org 
with "unsubscribe adsl" in the body of the message