Joel Wiramu Pauling wrote:
> Ok this is a goodie... Let me take time to answer this fully.
>
> On Tue, 2005-10-25 at 18:16 +1300, Keith & Deby wrote:
>
>>Have been watching this for a while, somewhere back a mention was made re
>>part of the problem was the speed and hosting of some sort, plus dynamic
>>ips...
> I have 2 Postnuke sites including all the crap, on this site. Both are
> not large sites. I also have a wordpress and pm wiki site + a few static
> pages. All of which are top hits in google. The sites don't do much
> traffic. BUT I can tell you, the LINK IS CRAP, with just 1 connection
> there is MASSIVE slowdown. Don't take my word... try it...
>
> I don't care about traffic from my webserv... I do care about
> throughput. We are handing out pamphlets to 1000's of students in a
> couple of hours or doing signups. 128kps... JOKE! Even with pf crafting
> (which beleive you me I do on incoming traf as well) 192 was bellow par.

[trimmed]

Simple solution? Stop trying to use a connection which is clearly
insufficient for your needs. It's clear that 128k, 160k, or 192k, is
not sufficient for you.

You might want to look at a webhosting account with a reputable
webhosting company; or look at colocating a server somewhere.

aj.

-- 
This message is part of the NZ ADSL mailing list. 
see http://unixathome.org/adsl/ for archives, FAQ, 
and various documents. 
To unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@lists.unixathome.org 
with "unsubscribe adsl" in the body of the message